Received 03.11.2025, Revised 19.02.2026, Accepted 24.03.2026

Linguistic and cultural representation of success in English: British and American perspectives

Cholpon Bekbalaeva, Jildizkan Beyshenova, Gulnura Dzhumalieva, Aida Kasieva

Success as a cultural concept plays an important role in British and American societies, yet its linguistic representation and cultural interpretation remain insufficiently studied from a comprehensive cultural linguistics perspective. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the semantic structure and culturally specific features of the “success” concept in English examining its linguistic objectification and culture-specific representations through a systematic comparison of British and American linguistic cultures. The research combined componential analysis, conceptual analysis, dictionary definition analysis, contextual analysis, conceptual metaphor theory, and comparative analysis. The material included data from English dictionaries, sources with phraseological units, literary works, and research papers. Key findings showed that “success” has eight semantic components: conceptual, axiological, figurative, symbolic, social, emotional, functional, and etymological. By means of the componential analysis it was revealed that while “success” is the broadest term, the related terms, like “achievement”, “accomplishment”, “prosperity”, and “triumph” focus on specific aspects. The study identified significant Anglo-American differences in “success” conceptualisations: while British culture values understatement and work-life balance, American culture values self-made success and competitiveness. Gender analysis showed women value balance while men value status; generational analysis showed a shift toward flexibility and experience over career markers. The research contributes new empirical data to cultural linguistics by showing how concepts can change depending on culture, gender, and age. Practical application includes training in intercultural communication, teaching English as a second language, and marketing strategies that need to be aware of cultural success orientation

“success” concept; cultural linguistics; semantic structure; Anglo-American culture; cultural values; conceptual analysis; comparative linguistics
8-22
Bekbalaeva, Ch., Beyshenova, J., Dzhumalieva, G., & Kasieva, A. (2026). Linguistic and cultural representation of success in English: British and American perspectives. Bulletin of the Bishkek State University, 24(1), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.35254/ss/1.2026.08

References

  1. Acs, Z.J., Szerb, L., Lafuente, E., & Lloyd, A. (2018). Global Entrepreneurship Index 2018. Retrieved from https://surl.li/hzdglv.
  2. Arutyunova, N.D. (1999). Language and the world of man. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture.
  3. Babushkin, A.P. (1996). Types of concepts in the lexical-phraseological semantics of language. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Publishing.
  4. Butler, S. (2024). Young people on social media in a globalized world: Self-optimization in highly competitive and achievement-oriented forms of life. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, article number 1340605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1340605.
  5. Cambridge dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/.
  6. Carnegie, D. (1936). How to win friends and influence people. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  7. Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2006). Work-life “balance” in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 49(4), 379-393. doi: 10.1177/0001699306071680.
  8. Cullen, J. (2004). The American dream: A short history of an idea that shaped a nation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. De Beer, L.T., Horn, J., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2022). Construct and criterion validity of the Dutch Workaholism Scale (DUWAS) within the South African financial services context. SAGE Open, 12(1). doi: 10.1177/21582440221079879.
  10. Deloitte. (2019). The Deloitte global millennial survey 2019. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/deloitte-2019-millennial-survey.pdf.
  11. Derbisheva, Z.K. (2020). Key concepts of Kyrgyz cultural linguistics. Moscow: FLINTA Publishing House.
  12. Dermott, E. (2008). Intimate fatherhood: A sociological analysis. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203927069.
  13. Dickens, Ch. (2008). Great expectations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  14. El Husseiny, I.A., Al Samman, A., Mansour, S., & Ibrahim, F. (2025). How do cultural values affect economic growth? An empirical evidence from world values survey (1994-2021). Review of Economics and Political Science, 10(6), 414-441. doi: 10.1108/REPS-02-2023-0012.
  15. Emerson, R.W. (2005). Self-reliance. In Essays by Ralph Waldo Emerson. Boston: James Munroe and Company.
  16. Eurostat. (2019). Average number of usual weekly hours of work in main job. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
  17. Fitzgerald, F.S. (1925). The Great Gatsby. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  18. Fox, K. (2004). Watching the English: The hidden rules of English behavior. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  19. Friedman, S., O’Brien, D., & McDonald, I. (2021). Deflecting privilege: Class identity and the intergenerational self. Sociology, 55(4), 716-733. doi: 10.1177/00380385209822.
  20. GEM. (2024). GEM 2023/2024 global report. Retrieved from https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/global-entrepreneurship-monitor-gem-20232024-global-report-25-years-and-growing.
  21. Goldthorpe, J.H. (2016). Social class mobility in modern Britain: Changing structure, constant process. Journal of the British Academy, 4, 89-111. doi: 10.5871/jba/004.089.
  22. GOV.UK. (2020). Holiday entitlement. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/holiday-entitlement-rights.
  23. Hammadi, S.S. (2023). Mental space theory: A review of cognitive processes and applications. Journal of Language and Linguistics in Society, 3(1), 42-47. doi: 10.55529/jlls.31.42.47.
  24. Henrekson, M., & Sanandaji, T. (2014). Small business activity does not measure entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(5), 1760-1765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307204111.
  25. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  26. Hollywood Walk of Fame. (n.d.). History of the walk of fame. Retrieved from https://walkoffame.com/history/.
  27. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W.E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19-51. doi: 10.2307/2657288.
  28. Karasik, V.I. (2002). Language circle: Personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena.
  29. Karasik, V.I., & Slyshkin, G.G. (2001). Linguocultural concept as a unit of research. In Methodological problems of cognitive linguistics (pp. 75-79). Voronezh State University.
  30. Kirby, P. (2016). Leading people 2016: The educational backgrounds of the UK professional elite. Retrieved from https://www.suttontrust.com/our-research/leading-people-2016/.
  31. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. London: University of Chicago Press.
  32. Lenci, A., & Padó, S. (2022). Perspectives for natural language processing between AI, linguistics and cognitive science. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, article number 1059998. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.1059998.
  33. Lyonette, C., Kaufman, G., & Crompton, R. (2011). “We both need to work”: Maternal employment, childcare and health care in Britain and the USA. Work, Employment and Society, 25(1), 34-50. doi: 10.1177/0950017010389243.
  34. Marwick, A.E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  35. Merriam-Webster dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/.
  36. Mijs, J.J.B. (2021). The paradox of inequality: Income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socio-Economic Review, 19(1), 7-35. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwy051.
  37. Mushyrovska, N., Kholod, I., Neher, O., Zozulia, I., & Pavliuk, I. (2022). Fundamental cognitive-semantic theories in linguistics. Revista Eduweb, 16(3), 261-273. doi: 10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2022.16.03.19.
  38. OECD. (2019). Employment outlook 2019: The future of work. doi: 10.1787/9ee00155-en.
  39. Oxford English dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.oed.com/.
  40. Pace, F., & Sciotto, G. (2022). Gender differences in the relationship between work-life balance, career opportunities and general health perception. Sustainability, 14(1), article number 357. doi: 10.3390/su14010357.
  41. Parry, E., & Urwin, P. (2011). Generational differences in work values: A review of theory and evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 79-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00285.x.
  42. Pew Research Center. (2010). Baby boomers approach 65 – glumly. Retrieved from https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2010/12/20/baby-boomers-approach-65-glumly.
  43. Pew Research Center. (2012). Pursuing the American dream: Economic mobility across generations. Retrieved from https://www.pew.org/-/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/pcs_assets/2012/pursuingamericandreampdf.pdf.
  44. Pimenova, M.V. (2007). The concept of heart: Image. Notion. Symbol. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University.
  45. Pimenova, M.V., & Kapenova, Zh.Zh. (2016). Conceptual research in modern linguistics: Theory and practice. In Multicultural space of language in Kazakhstan (p. 151). Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Economics.
  46. Polzenhagen, F., Wolf, H.-G., Latić, D., & Peters, A. (2024). World Englishes and cultural linguistics: Theory and research. World Englishes, 43(3), 360-378. doi: 10.1111/weng.12655.
  47. Popova, Z.D., & Sternin, I.A. (2007). Cognitive linguistics. Moscow: AST, East-West.
  48. Rosanoff, M.A. (1932). Edison in his laboratory. Harper’s Monthly Magazine, 165, 402-417.
  49. Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  50. Simpson, J., & Speake, J. (Eds.). (2009). Oxford dictionary of proverbs (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acref/9780199539536.001.0001.
  51. Slaughter, A.M. (2015). Unfinished business: Women men work family. New York: Random House.
  52. Smiles, S. (1859). Self-help. London: John Murray.
  53. Stanford Report. (2005). “You’ve got to find what you love”, Jobs says. Retrieved from https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2005/06/youve-got-find-love-jobs-says.
  54. Stepanov, Yu.S. (2004). Constants: Dictionary of Russian culture (3rd ed.). Moscow: Academic Project.
  55. Surzhanskaya, Yu.V. (2011). Individual and cultural concepts: General and different. Language and Culture, 15(3), 87-93.
  56. The Sutton Trust. (2019). Elitist Britain 2019: The educational backgrounds of Britain’s leading people. Retrieved from https://www.suttontrust.com/our-research/elitist-britain-2019/.
  57. Townsend, N.W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work, and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  58. Twenge, J.M., & Kasser, T. (2013). Generational changes in materialism and work centrality, 1976-2007: Associations with temporal changes in societal insecurity and materialistic role modeling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(7), 883-897. doi: 10.1177/0146167213484586.
  59. Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Macmillan.
  60. Vorkachev, S.G. (2001). Cultural linguistics, language personality, concept: The formation of an anthropocentric paradigm in linguistics. Philological Sciences, 1, 64-72.
  61. Vorkachev, S.G. (2003). Concept as an “umbrella term”. In Language, consciousness, communication (Vol. 24, pp. 5-12). Moscow: Moscow State University.
  62. Weber, M. (1905). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London & Boston: Unwin Hyman.
  63. White, J.G. (1998). Cambridge international dictionary of idioms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  64. Zakrzewski, A., Tang, T., Appell, G., Hardie, A., Hildebrandt, N., Kahlich, M., Mende, M., Muxí, F., & Xavier, A. (2019). Global wealth 2019: Reigniting radical growth. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/global-wealth-reigniting-radical-growth.
  65. Zhao, X., Zheng, Y., & Zhao, X. (2023). Global bibliometric analysis of conceptual metaphor research over the recent two decades. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, article number 1101463. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1042121.