Received 27.02.2024, Revised 17.05.2024, Accepted 11.06.2024

The CWPP Model in the Process of Learning and Teaching

Kozan Fati

The CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product), developed by Daniel Stufflebeam, is widely used for evaluating educational programs. It provides a comprehensive approach, assessing not only outcomes but also the context, resources, and the process of program implementation. The model includes four components: evaluation of context, input data, process, and product. Applying the CIPP model in education contributes to improving the quality of learning and student achievement through continuous program enhancement. The advantages of the model include comprehensive evaluation, feedback, and guidance for improvement processes. However, there are limitations that should be taken into account when using it. The CIPP model offers a valuable tool for making well-grounded decisions in the educational field

CIPP models, program evaluation, training, Daniel Stufflebeam, context evaluation, input evaluation
129-135
Fati, K. (2024). The CWPP Model in the Process of Learning and Teaching. Bulletin of the Bishkek State University, 22(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.35254/bsu/2024.68.22

References

1. Ornstein, A. Curriculum. Foundation, Principles, and Issues / A. Ornstein, F. Hunkins. – 5th ed. – United States : Pearson International Edition, 2009. – 376 p. – ISBN 978-0205592579.
2. Harrington, A. D. Evaluating Community Participation in Health Care Decision-Ma- king: The Case of the Airdrie/North Rocky View Health Needs Project : Master’s thesis / A. D. Harrington ; Wilfrid Laurier University. – Waterloo, 2008. – 156 p.
3. Demirel, Ö. Eğitimde Program Geliştirme. Kuramdan Uygulamaya / Ö. Demirel. – An- kara : PegemA Yayıncılık, 2006. – 354 s. – ISBN 978-9756802748.
4. Buist, M. Illuminative Evaluation / M. Buist // Evaluation Research Highlights / ed. J. Lishman. – London : Department of Social Work University of Aberdeen, 1984. – P. 85- 96.
5. Tekin, M. Evaluation of a preparatory school program at a public university in Turkey / M. Tekin // The Journal of International Social Research. – 2015. – Vol. 8, № 36. – P. 718-733.
6. Brooker, M. R. Youth Mentoring and Adult-Youth Relationships: The Importance of Context : магистерская диссертация / M. R. Brooker ; Murdoch University. – Murdo- ch, 2009. – 132 p.
7. Fitzpatrick, J. L. Program Evaluation. Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines / J. L. Fitzpatrick, J. R. Sanders, B. R. Worthen. – 3rd ed. – Boston : Allyn and Bacon, 2004. – 555 p. – ISBN 978-0321077066.
8. Parlett, M. Introduction to Illuminative Evaluation: Studies in Higher Education / M. Parlett, G. Dearden. – California : Pacific Soundings Press, 1977. – 180 p. – ISBN 978- 0892880201.
9. Buist, M. Illuminative Evaluation / M. Buist // Evaluation Research Highlights / ed. J. Lishman. – London : Department of Social Work University of Aberdeen, 1984. – P. 85- 96.
10. Fitzpatrick, J. L. Program Evaluation. Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines / J. L. Fitzpatrick, J. R. Sanders, B. R. Worthen. – 3rd ed. – Boston : Allyn and Bacon, 2004. – 555 p. – ISBN 978-0321077066.
11. Chang, I. Y. An Evaluation Of Curricular Implementation in Central City English Villa- ge: A Case of An Elementary School in Southern Taiwan : докторская диссертация / I. Y. Chang; Alliant International University. – San Diego, 2010. – 201 p.
12. Ellis, L. Academics' Perceptions of the Professional and Clinical Doctorate: Findings of A National Survey / L. Ellis // Journal of Clinical Nursing. – 2007. – Vol. 16. – P. 2272- 2279.